Obama is now the official nominee crowned by the media. (Although since he doesn’t have the pledged delegate supports he needs, it won’t really be official until the convention.) But, this new turn of events will focus the campaigns.
That means the general election is going into full swing. So “brace yourself.” Get ready for political ads to say candidate X voted for this horrible thing or voted against this really great thing. However, whenever you see such attacks you need to understand the nature of Congress.
In today’s Congress the House and Senate vote on omnibus bills, these really large “mega bills” that are hundreds of pages long. So the overall point of a bill may be something that the Congressman opposed such as welfare spending (if it was a Republican member of Congress), but on page 312 there was a section funding a hospital. Well near November expect to see the political ads condemning the Congressman for not supporting hospitals. (Just imagine the fun images a creative ad specialist could create.)
Both Obama and McCain are members of the Senate and have voting records that the candidates have already mentioned. (Obama mentions that McCain voted for the Iraq war; McCain mentioned some votes of Mr. Obama’s in his speech tonight, June 3.)
When you hear ads about this vote or that vote, do your homework. Read the newspaper, watch the news, go to sites like www.votesmart.org and find out for yourself. Don’t let the negative attacks convince you. Be an intelligent voter! The only reason these ads are still on TV is because they work. They work because you listen to them and other mud slinging. (Wait Obama is not a Muslim?)
It is important that you take the time to be a smart voter, because if you don’t know who or what you are voting for, well what’s the point? These campaigns to just get you to vote make me angry. I recently saw a T-Shirt in one of those hip youth clothing outlets that just said “Vote” on it. Please vote intelligently. The alternative is to listen to negative ads and vote against the candidate that voted against breast cancer research or had an illegitimate black baby. (That’s how Republicans nominate George W. Bush…Vote smart!)
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
no, thats how me nominated john mccain. (and prolly bush too but I was too young to care then) negative ads, and dumb people suck. good blog.
Thanks, for the comment however I was referring to the 2000 Republican primary contest.Here is a link that shows the "black baby attack."
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/01/mccains_south_carolina_prolife.php
And this is a link to a site describing that attacks on John McCain in 2000 about breast cancer.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9e07e3de1738f937a35750c0a9669c8b63
I also have to say McCain has run a pretty clean campaign so far. I was just warning that future negative ads will show up (although they might not be in the Presidential race), and more importantly telling people to not pay attention to them and educate themselves about the candidates.
Again though I am very glad that you liked the blog.
yep I was definitely too young to have any idea what those were, consequently I misunderstood your point there. thanks for the links.
my point was that the republicans ended up with a nominee most of them(read: the conservatives) didn't really want because of the political games and 2 different candidates (romney and huckabee) that split the majority of the republican base in half, leaving McCain to clean up the more moderate side of the base and wind up with the nominee.
and the democrats right now arent 100% unified behind obama, so neither party has a candidate their whole base is really happy with. this should be interesting. (I should start my on blog with comments as long as this, geez.)
Post a Comment